A critique of running records

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Supplementary material

Other Title

Authors

Blaiklock, Ken

Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)

Degree

Grantor

Date

2004-01-01

Supervisors

Type

Journal Article

Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)

Keyword

reading
assessment

ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)

Citation

Blaiklock, K. (2004). A critique of running records of children’s oral reading. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39, 241-253.

Abstract

Running records of children‟s oral reading are commonly used to assess children‟s reading and to make decisions about the types of reading instruction that children require. This paper critiques recent guidelines on the use of running records and questions the value of this assessment technique. The guidelines are unclear about whether running records should be used for beginning and fluent readers. There are difficulties in making comparisons between running records taken on different texts, and running records do not assess comprehension. The paper argues that the analysis of oral reading errors is a time consuming procedure that may provide misleading information about the type of instruction that would most benefit a particular child.

Publisher

New Zealand Association for Research in Education

Link to ePress publication

DOI

Copyright holder

New Zealand Association for Research in Education

Copyright notice

All rights reserved

Copyright license

Available online at

This item appears in: