A critique of running records

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Supplementary material
Other Title
Authors
Blaiklock, Ken
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2004-01-01
Supervisors
Type
Journal Article
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
reading
assessment
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Blaiklock, K. (2004). A critique of running records of children’s oral reading. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39, 241-253.
Abstract
Running records of children‟s oral reading are commonly used to assess children‟s reading and to make decisions about the types of reading instruction that children require. This paper critiques recent guidelines on the use of running records and questions the value of this assessment technique. The guidelines are unclear about whether running records should be used for beginning and fluent readers. There are difficulties in making comparisons between running records taken on different texts, and running records do not assess comprehension. The paper argues that the analysis of oral reading errors is a time consuming procedure that may provide misleading information about the type of instruction that would most benefit a particular child.
Publisher
New Zealand Association for Research in Education
Link to ePress publication
DOI
Copyright holder
New Zealand Association for Research in Education
Copyright notice
All rights reserved
Copyright license
Available online at
This item appears in: