Breaking the bubble: How can generative AI reshape opinion formation and echo chambers
Loading...
Supplementary material
Other Title
Authors
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
Supervisors
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
marketing communications education
AI in marketing
algorithmic marketing
communication in marketing
brand perception
personalization (marketing)
chatbots
AI in marketing
algorithmic marketing
communication in marketing
brand perception
personalization (marketing)
chatbots
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Ibrahim, K. (2025) Breaking the bubble: How can generative AI reshape opinion formation and echo chambers. In Shaalan, A., McCabe, S., & Kerrigan, F. (Ed.), 29th International Conference on Corporate and Marketing Communications 2025 (CMC25), 29, 62-67.
https://hdl.handle.net/10652/7190
Abstract
The rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) is reshaping opinion formation by influencing how individuals consume and interpret information. AI-driven tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and DeepSeek offer access to diverse viewpoints, yet they also risk reinforcing echo chambers and filter bubbles, limiting exposure to alternative perspectives. This study examines the role of GAI in shaping, reinforcing, or disrupting digital silos, focusing on the interaction between AI generated content and human cognition.
This study adopts a qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with industry experts and GAI users to explore how generative AI tools influence opinion formation. Thematic analysis is applied to uncover key patterns in user engagement and AI’s role in digital discourse. The findings contribute to theoretical debates on opinion formation by integrating human-based cognitive models with AI driven learning mechanisms. Managerially, this study offers insights for AI developers, policymakers, and marketers on designing AI systems that encourage balanced information consumption. By questioning AI’s potential as either a neutral facilitator or a biased curator, this study contributes to broader discussions on AI ethics, misinformation, and digital polarisation in the evolving media landscape.
Publisher
University of Birmingham
Permanent link
Link to ePress publication
DOI
Copyright holder
Author
Copyright notice
All rights reserved
