The effectiveness of signage at mitigating visitor-bird interactions at Auckland Zoo

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Other Title
Authors
Nielson, B.
Kemp, Caralyn
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2022-12-09
Supervisors
Type
Conference Contribution - Oral Presentation
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
Auckland Zoo (N.Z.)
Auckland (N.Z.)
New Zealand
zoo visitors
behaviour change intervention
human-bird interactions
signage
animal welfare
zoos
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Nielson, B., & Kemp, C. (2022, December 8-9). The effectiveness of signage at mitigating visitor-bird interactions at Auckland Zoo [Paper presentation]. Rangahau: Te Mana o te Mahi Kotahitanga: Research: The Power of Collaboration, MIT/Unitec Research Symposium 2022, Te Pūkenga, New Zealand
Abstract
Auckland Zoo has had reports of high levels of visitor-bird interactions in three walkthrough aviaries: red-tailed black cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus banksii) (RTBC), kea (Nestor notabilis), and kaka (Nestor meridionalis). There is concern that these visitor-bird interactions may have negative impacts on the welfare of both bird and visitor. Current prevention methods of these potentially negative behaviours (PNBs) are volunteer presence and signage. However, there have been few studies investigating how effective these strategies are at reducing visitor interactions. We investigated the frequency of visitor-bird interactions at the three locations to determine who was eliciting them, and did so under two conditions: signage and no signage. Three sign types were trialled. Approximately 40hrs at each enclosure were spent recording the number of visitors and the number of visitors who engaged with a bird, who elicited the interaction, and basic demographics of the visitor involved. Results found visitors elicited interactions three times more often than birds. The kea exhibit had the highest proportion of interactions, compared to the other walkthrough enclosures. Signage was not more effective than no signage at reducing visitor-bird interactions in the kea and RTBC exhibit. Only Sign 1 was more effective than no signage in the kaka exhibit (p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in proportion of PNBs between age groups in any exhibit and only a sex difference in the kea enclosure. It is difficult to speculate why signage had little impact, but anecdotal observations found that volunteers, and even some keepers, would either ignore or encourage visitor-bird interactions. This suggests that visitors may be taking their cue from other people, rather than from informative signs. Indeed, previous research has found that zoo visitors rarely read signage. With signage not being effective at Auckland Zoo, and volunteers not deterring visitors from engaging in PNBs with the birds, future research needs to identify visitor motivations and alternative mitigation strategies to suitably educate visitors on appropriate behaviour with animals.
Publisher
Link to ePress publication
DOI
Copyright holder
Authors
Copyright notice
All rights reserved
Copyright license
Available online at
This item appears in: