Planning and teaching effective workplace literacy, language and numeracy programmes : what does research tell us?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Supplementary material

Other Title

Authors

Benseman, John

Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)

Degree

Grantor

Date

2010

Supervisors

Type

Journal Article

Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)

Keyword

workplace literacy
workplace numeracy
workplace language
New Zealand
workplace education

ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)

Citation

While there is any amount of writing about what differentiates between effective workplace literacy, language and numeracy (LLN) programmes and their less effective counterparts, only a fraction of this writing is based on original research studies (Ananiadou, Jenkins et al. 2003; Ananiadou, Emslie-Henry et al. 2004; Gray 2006). Most of the literature (see for example, The Conference Board of Canada 2005) is based on surveys of opinions (usually employers’) or simple post-course evaluations. This article outlines which factors enhance the effectiveness of workplace LLN programmes based on detailed evaluation findings from 18 workplace courses run in New Zealand companies.

Abstract

Publisher

Link to ePress publication

DOI

Copyright holder

Billy Osteen

Copyright notice

All rights reserved

Copyright license

Available online at

This item appears in: