A cluster-driven energy routing protocol for optimal network lifetime in ad hoc networks
Loading...
Supplementary material
Other Title
Authors
Airehrour, David
Cherrington, M.
Madanian, S.
Cherrington, M.
Madanian, S.
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2019-06-11
Supervisors
Type
Journal Article
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
mobile networks
power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems (PEGASIS)
PEGASIS
mobile ad hoc networks (MANET)
MANET (Computing)
PEGADyn
cluster heads (HDs)
power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems (PEGASIS)
PEGASIS
mobile ad hoc networks (MANET)
MANET (Computing)
PEGADyn
cluster heads (HDs)
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Airehrour, D., Cherrington, M., & Madanian, S. (2019). A Cluster-Driven Energy Routing Protocol for Optimal Network Lifetime in Ad Hoc Networks. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 7(2), 16-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v7n2.183
Abstract
Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is a group of networked mobile devices working in a cooperative manner. Due to usage, these devices quickly run out of battery power in critical situations and consequently fail in packet transmission. Power-Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information Systems (PEGASIS) and Dynamic State algorithm are two research works with unique energy efficiency concepts that, if harmonized and refined, will deliver a better optimized energy-efficient routing protocol for MANETs. This study, therefore, proposes PEGADyn – a hybrid version of PEGASIS and Dynamic State algorithm for a new energy-efficient routing protocol in ad hoc networks. PEGADyn creates a virtual grid classification of nodes based on current location, followed by a cluster formation of nodes in each virtual grid created. In each cluster and virtual grid formed, cluster heads (CHs) and designated cluster heads (dCH) are selected based on their energy levels. CHs and dCHs are used for communication between clusters and virtual grids. The use of CHs and dCHs limits communication overheads among nodes, reducing the energy expended and increasing the network lifetime. A simulation comparison of PEGADyn with PEGASIS and Dynamic State shows PEGADyn to be better in extending network lifetime and maintaining network throughput.
Publisher
Telecommunications Association Inc.
Permanent link
Link to ePress publication
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v7n2.183
Copyright holder
Copyright Telecommunications Association Inc.
Copyright notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand