An overview of radiochemical identity and radiochemical purity of 18F-FDG and factor affecting the RCP

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Supplementary material

Other Title

Authors

Vyas, Madhusudan
Sharma, Sandeep

Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)

Degree

Grantor

Date

2023-08-28

Supervisors

Type

Conference Contribution - Paper in Published Proceedings

Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)

Keyword

radiochemical purity (RCP)
nuclear medicine

ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)

Citation

Vyas, M., & Sharma, S. (2023). An overview of radiochemical identity and radiochemical purity of 18F-FDG and factor affecting the RCP. In Journal of Nuclear Medicine (Ed.), SNMMI-2023 , Vol. 64 (pp. T37). doi:2159-662X https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/64/supplement_1/T37

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The radiopharmaceutical known as fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is the one that is utilised most frequently in PET-CT imaging. In the first place, it is applied to the diagnosis and evaluation of various stages of cancer. Because it has such a wide variety of applications, the use of 18F-FDG has expanded. In order to produce 18F-FDG, a multi-step procedure must be followed. These steps include the following: production of 18F-fluoride in a cyclotron by bombarding 16O-water with a proton beam; trapping of 18F-fluoride in an ion exchange column (QMA) in the synthesis module; elution of 18F-fluoride from the QMA column by TBA or Kryprofix solution; azeotropic drying; mannose triflate Following the completion of the purification process, the final product is collected in a sterile vial after going through a sterile filter with a pore size of 0.22 microns and being further filtered. Both the radiochemical identity (RI) and the radiochemical purity (RCP) are essential quality control characteristics; hence, it is essential that they be evaluated using techniques that have been authorised and validated, and the findings of the test need to satisfy the requirements for batch release. A low RCP can result in a low target-to-non-target ratio, an increase in blood pool or background activity, poor picture quality, a compromised diagnosis, and an increased radiation dosage to the patient as a result of a change in the biological half-life or the necessity of a repeat examination.

Publisher

Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Link to ePress publication

DOI

Copyright holder

Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Copyright notice

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International