Managing curriculum change and 'ontological uncertainty' in tertiary education

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Supplementary material

Other Title

Authors

Keesing-Styles, Linda
Nash, Simon
Ayres, Robert

Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)

Degree

Grantor

Date

2013

Supervisors

Type

Journal Article

Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)

Keyword

change management
curriculum reform
ontology
professional development
teacher identity

ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)

Citation

Keesing-Styles, L., Nash, S., & Ayres, R. (2013). Managing curriculum change and 'ontological uncertainty' in tertiary education. Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australasia, 32 (1), 1-14. DOI:10.1080/07294360.2013.841655

Abstract

Curriculum reform at institutional level is a challenging endeavour. Those charged with leading this process will encounter both enthusiasm and multiple obstacles to teacher engagement including the particularly complex issue of confronting existing teacher identities. At Unitec Institute of Technology (Unitec), the ‘Living Curriculum’ initiative focused on whole-of-institution curriculum renewal and, in the process, acknowledged and addressed teacher beliefs and practices that variously supported and contested both the initiative itself and the professional development offerings that accompanied it. The related research project identified factors and processes that unsettle teachers, rendering them ‘insecure’, and strategies that have proven effective in supporting teachers through significant change in conceptions of curriculum, teaching and learning.

Publisher

Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australasia

Link to ePress publication

DOI

10.1080/07294360.2013.841655

Copyright holder

Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australasia

Copyright notice

All rights reserved

Copyright license

Available online at

This item appears in: