Use of gene expression programing for multi-model combination of rainfall-runoff models

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Supplementary material
Other Title
Authors
Fernando, Achela
Shamseldin, Asaad
Abrahart, Robert
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2012
Supervisors
Type
Journal Article
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
rainfall-runoff model
symbolic regression
model combination
gene expression programming
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Fernando, A., Shamseldin, A., & Abrahart, R. (2011). Use of gene expression programing for multi-model combination of rainfall- runoff models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17(9), 975–985. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000533
Abstract
This paper deals with the application of an innovative method for combining estimated outputs from a number of rainfall-runoff models using Gene Expression Programming (GEP) to perform symbolic regression. The GEP multi-model combination method uses the synchronous simulated river flows from four conventional rainfall-runoff models to produce a set of combined river flow estimates for four different catchments. The four selected models for the multi-model combinations are the Linear Perturbation Model (LPM), the Linearly Varying Gain Factor Model (LVGFM), the Soil Moisture Accounting and Routing (SMAR) Model, and the Probability-Distributed Interacting Storage Capacity (PDISC) model. The first two of these models are ‘black-box’ models, the LPM exploiting seasonality and the LVGFM employing a storage-based coefficient of runoff. The remaining two are conceptual models. The data of four catchments with different geographical location, hydrological and climatic conditions, are used to test the performance of the GEP combination method. The results of the model using GEP method are compared against original forecasts obtained from the individual models that contributed to the development of the combined model by means of a few global statistics. The findings show that a GEP approach can successfully used as a multi-model combination method. In addition, the GEP combination method also has benefit over other hitherto tested approaches such as an artificial neural network combination method in that its formulation is transparent, can be expressed as a simple mathematical function, and therefore is useable by people who are unfamiliar with such advanced techniques. The GEP combination method is able to combine model outcomes from less accurate individual models and produce a superior river flow forecast.
Publisher
American Society of Civil Engineers
Link to ePress publication
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000533
Copyright holder
American Society of Civil Engineers
Copyright notice
All rights reserved
Copyright license