Impact of positive pressure ventilation systems on indoor air quality in residential settings
Loading...
Supplementary material
Other Title
Authors
Hernandez, German
Borge, R.
Blanchon, Dan
Berry, Terri-Ann
Borge, R.
Blanchon, Dan
Berry, Terri-Ann
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2025-11-01
Supervisors
Type
Journal Article
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
New Zealand
residential hoursing
indoor air quality
mechnaical ventilation
residential hoursing
indoor air quality
mechnaical ventilation
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Hernandez, G., Borge, R., Blanchon, D.J., & Berry, T-A. September. (2025). Impact of positive pressure ventilation systems on indoor air quality in residential settings. Building and Environment, 283, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113323
Abstract
Effective ventilation is a key requirement in residential buildings to achieve healthy indoor air quality (IAQ) through the introduction of fresh air. Mechanical ventilation (MV) systems are designed to meet IAQ objectives by delivering regular air exchange and dilution of stale air. Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) systems commonly source air from the roof cavity and distribute it throughout the indoor environment.
This study evaluated the effects of PPV systems on IAQ in 10 single-family dwellings over a nine-month period across three seasons (winter, spring and summer) and including pre-and post-installation monitoring. Regular measurements of IAQ parameters including PM2.5, PM10, radon, fungal DNA, and heavy metals were collected from bedrooms, living areas, roof spaces and outdoors.
Mean indoor concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 each decreased by 44 % following PPV installation. Outdoor levels of PM2.5 and PM10 increased over the same period, by 41 % and 37 %, respectively. Reductions in mean indoor concentrations were also observed for radon (53 %) and fungal DNA (64 %). Indoor concentrations of heavy metals also decreased, with chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc decreasing by 28 % on average, while arsenic and cadmium were generally below detection limits.
Indoor PM2.5 concentrations were 31 % higher than roof space concentrations, and weakly correlated (Spearman’s coefficient, rs = 0.12), suggesting limited influence from the roof cavity. Temperatures in the roof space were 7.1 °C lower, on average, than indoor temperatures. Analysis suggests that a higher temperature differential between roof and indoors is associated with higher levels of energy use, particularly at differentials above 4 °C.
Publisher
Springer
Permanent link
Link to ePress publication
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113323
Copyright holder
Authors
Copyright notice
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International