Food preference and demand in a ramp task in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus)
Loading...
Supplementary material
Other Title
Authors
Walker, T.W.
Hoult, C.
Cameron, Kristie
Hoult, C.
Cameron, Kristie
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2024
Supervisors
Type
Journal Article
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus)
food preferences
exercise
ramps
animal behaviour and welfare
food preferences
exercise
ramps
animal behaviour and welfare
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Walker, T.W., Hoult., C., & Cameron, K.E. (2024).Food preference and demand in a ramp task in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). International Journal of Comparative Psychology,, 37, 2-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.19475
Abstract
Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) are popular pets and used as laboratory animals, however, their dietary preferences are under-studied. It is important for guinea pig owners and carers to increase the opportunity for good animal welfare by providing personalized and enriching dietary options. Thus, this study aimed to assess the use of paired-stimulus and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessments to determine the food preferences of seven male guinea pigs and test the validity of the methods by testing the demand for the most- and least preferred foods as reinforcers for climbing an elevated ramp. Generally, the preference assessments identified the same foods as the most preferred for each guinea pig, but not the least preferred foods. Guinea pigs climbed up to the steepest angle for both most and least preferred foods, but a non-linear least squares regression and demand analysis indicated faster climbing and inelastic demand for most preferred foods compared to slower climbing and elastic demand for least preferred foods. Both preference assessment methods were valid in identifying a preferred food, however, the multiple-stimulus-without-replacement assessment was more efficient to conduct. High-preference foods such as parsley and dandelion are recommended as future training reinforcers for guinea pigs and as foods to consider using as enrichment in captive guinea pig systems to encourage good welfare.
Publisher
University of California, Los Angeles
Permanent link
Link to ePress publication
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.19475
Copyright holder
Authors
Copyright notice
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International