“Fly on the wall” Can the presence of the student during the assessment process help in their learning?
Loading...
Supplementary material
Other Title
Authors
Rennie, Julian
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2010-01-01
Supervisors
Type
Conference Contribution - Paper in Published Proceedings
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
student feedback
student assessment
learning transparency
student assessment
learning transparency
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Rennie, J. (2010). “Fly on the wall” Can the presence of the student during the assessment process help in their learning?. In G. Forsyth (Ed.). Proceedings of ConnectED 2010 - 2nd International Conference on Design Education, Sydney. Retrieved from http://connected2010.eproceedings.com.au/abstracts.html
Abstract
The Design studio learning system within most Tertiary Design Schools has a unique critique method, (often called “The Crit”). The Crit event itself is rather a “veiled” process and has been analyzed and written about extensively. There has also been a lot of negative feedback from students that this form of critiquing process is not necessarily a good type of feedback process. Is there a method that protects the student’s privacy related to his or her own design work and at the same time maintains the Design School’s integrity of supplying reasoned and fair assessment within the wider Profession? A field trial scenario was designed and arranged with a group of volunteer design students, so each in turn, could sit-in and witness their own assessment / feedback session. This paper reports on this field trial, (timed to occur after the critique). The paper analyses this experiment, exploring the field trial responses, looking for links within a wider Educational literature base to the ground this “Fly on the Wall” scenario within known pedagogies.
Publisher
University of New South Wales
Permanent link
Link to ePress publication
DOI
Copyright holder
Julian Rennie
Copyright notice
All rights reserved