Workplace health promotion: Employee and employer perspectives

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Supplementary material

Other Title

Authors

Buckingham, Terry

Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)

Degree

Master of Nursing

Grantor

Eastern Institute of Technology

Date

2012

Supervisors

Marshall, Bob
Gibbons, Megan

Type

Masters Thesis

Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)

Keyword

New Zealand
employees
employers
workplaces
health promotion
workplace health promotion programmes
workplace programmes
perspectives
focus groups

ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)

Citation

Buckingham, T. (2012). Workplace health promotion: Employee and employer perspectives (Unpublished document submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Nursing). Eastern Institute of Technology (EIT), New Zealand.

Abstract

PURPOSE This qualitative focus group study defines the experience of a Workplace Health Promotion (WHP) programme from employee and employer perspectives. METHOD Participants who completed a 10-week WHP programme were asked their opinions and perceptions of the programme. The following questions were used as a semi structured question guideline; What were the Strengths of the WHP programme; What were the Weaknesses of the WHP programme; What are the Opportunities for the WHP programme; What are the Threats to the WHP programme. This line of questioning is commonly referred to as the acronym SWOT (DeSilets, 2008). SWOT is a simple group work tool that is well recognised, easy to use and is used here as a data collection method. Participants shared their opinions in two focus group discussions of employee participants (6) and a further purposive group who represented the employer participants (3) of the WHP programme. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analysed using Thomas’ (2006) general inductive approach a method of thematic analysis where the researcher begins with an area of study and allows the theory to emerge from the data. RESULTS Seven key themes emerged from the data. These were; barriers and enablers to participation; communication and information factors; tailoring and targeting issues; culture and leadership within WHP programmes; participation and competition influences; retention and attrition issues and finally health behaviour change and modification. IMPLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH This study provides insight into some important factors for those who participate, promote and deliver WHP programmes.

Publisher

Link to ePress publication

DOI

Copyright holder

Author

Copyright notice

All rights reserved

Copyright license

Available online at