Protecting stable biological nomenclatural systems enables universal communication: A collective international appeal

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Supplementary material

Other Title

Authors

Jiménez-Mejías, P.
Manzano, S.
Gowda, V.
Krell, F-T.
Lin, M.Y.
Martín-Bravo, S.
de Lange, Peter

Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)

Degree

Grantor

Date

2024-07-01

Supervisors

Type

Journal Article

Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)

Keyword

taxonomic nomenclature
taxonomy

ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)

Citation

Jiménez-Mejías, P., Manzano, S., Gowda, V., Krell, F-T., Lin, M.Y., Martín-Bravo, S., de Lange, P.J. and others (2024). Protecting stable biological nomenclatural systems enables universal communication: A collective international appeal. BioScience, 74(7), 467-472 https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae043

Abstract

The fundamental value of universal nomenclatural systems in biology is that they enable unambiguous scientific communication. However, the stability of these systems is threatened by recent discussions asking for a fairer nomenclature, raising the possibility of bulk revision processes for “inappropriate”names. It is evident that such proposals come from very deep feelings, but we show how they can irreparably damage the foundation of biological communication and, in turn, the sciences that depend on it. There are four essential consequences of objective codes of nomenclature: universality, stability, neutrality, and transculturality. These codes provide fair and impartial guides to the principles governing biological nomenclature and allow unambiguous universal communication in biology. Accordingly, no subjective proposals should be allowed to undermine them.

Publisher

Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences.

Link to ePress publication

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae043

Copyright holder

Authors

Copyright notice

CC BY-NC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Copyright license