Almost-always-falling-apart

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Supplementary material

Other Title

Authors

Budgett, Jeanette
Douglas, C.
Twose, S.

Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)

Degree

Grantor

Date

2022-03-09

Supervisors

Type

Journal Article

Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)

Keyword

disaster relief
repairing
COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-
pandemics
problem solving
climate change mitigation
environmental remediation
crisis management
architecture of resilience

ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)

Citation

Budgett, J.A., Douglas, C. & Twose, S. (Eds.). (2022). Almost-always-falling-apart. Interstices Journal of Architecture and Related Arts. 21 (Fixing), 2-9. enigma : he aupiki charitable trust, University of Auckand & Auckland University of Technology. https://interstices.ac.nz/index.php/Interstices/article/view/683/647

Abstract

This issue of Interstices coincides with a period of crisis: a global pandemic set against a backdrop of climate change and ecological disaster. Crises, times of intense difficulty or danger, signal turning or tipping points. They are unstable moments depending on emergent conditions, at which small changes might have big effects. Crises frequently demand urgent action, but also destabilise conventional patterns of thought, generating complexity and making simple solutions improbable. Previously successful strategies seem suddenly inadequate, and sometimes a surfeit of purported solutions does not change anything at all. Crises spill over economic, national, ecological, and biological bounds to form an overwhelming milieu or predicament, rather than a collection of discrete, well-bounded problems. Even where solutions are clear (stop burning fossil fuel, vaccinate), the path to those solutions can be unexpectedly complex. On edge, people rush to find certainty in ever-hardening positions; but fixed frameworks seem to generate antagonistic camps more likely to exacerbate crises than defuse them. These crises are bedded in the narratives of the modern capitalist project: stories of progress, human exceptionalism, individualism, and timely technical solutions. The figure of the individual innovator able to identify and overcome problems is a frequent protagonist in these stories, and architects and designers have frequently been seen (and seen themselves) in this light. Media ethnographer Stephen Jackson points to the way stories of innovation obscure the work it takes to keep the world going, and to adapt what already exists for new purposes. Redirecting attention to the work of fixing he writes, The question is this: can repair sites and repair actors claim special insight of knowledge, by virtue of their positioning vis-à-vis the worlds of technology they engage? Can breakdown, maintenance, and repair confer special epistemic advantage in our thinking about technology? Can the fixer know and see different things—indeed, different worlds—than the betterknown figures of ‘designer’ or ‘user’? (2014: 229)

Publisher

enigma : he aupiki charitable trust
University of Auckland
Auckland University of Technology

Link to ePress publication

DOI

https://interstices.ac.nz/index.php/Interstices/article/view/683/647

Copyright holder

Authors

Copyright notice

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Copyright license

This item appears in: