The empirical evidence available regarding self-myofascial release practices: A scoping review

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Supplementary material

Other Title

Authors

Mott, Jessica

Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)

Degree

Master of Osteopathy

Grantor

Unitec Institute of Technology

Date

2022

Supervisors

Anderson, Helen
MacFarlane, John

Type

Masters Thesis

Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)

Keyword

self-myofascial release (SMFR)
myofascial release
scoping reviews

Citation

Mott, J. (2022). The empirical evidence available regarding self-myofascial release practices: A scoping review (Unpublished document submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Osteopathy). Unitec Institute of Technology, New Zealand https://hdl.handle.net/10652/5973

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Self-myofascial release (SMFR) is a technique which has gained popularity in recent years, and it enables the person to perform a myofascial technique that mimics self-massage on themselves without the help of a health professional (Cheatham & Stull, 2018a; Giovanelli et al., 2018; Guillot et al., 2019). However, there is no single set of agreed guidelines regarding the use of SMFR (Cheatham & Kolber, 2018). SMFR is performed through a variety of tools such as foam rollers, roller massagers, spikey balls and roller balls. The study designs used for research can vary in quality. To date there is a lack of consensus and evidence on the theory and mechanism of how SMFR works despite the popularity of this technique. The research on SMFR is considerable and difficult to relate to the general population who are likely to use tools for SMFR as most of the research is based on specific populations e.g asymptomatic participants or specific sports. This study was conducted to identify the empirical evidence available regarding self-myofascial release practices. The rationale for this scoping review arises from SMFR becoming popular amongst the public and research articles but no summaries of the research have been performed. This scoping review has considered what research is available in the SMFR literature and what research is needed. Strengths, gaps, inconsistencies and quality of the current research has also been investigated.

Publisher

Link to ePress publication

DOI

Copyright holder

Author

Copyright notice

All rights reserved

Copyright license

Available online at