(Re-)uses of historical knowledge in architectural education: The value of the client – Reginald Ford on professional practice

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Other Title
Authors
Mađanović, M.
Moore, Cameron
Jadresin-Milic, Renata
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2021-12-21
Supervisors
Type
Journal Article
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
Gummer and Ford (Firm)
New Zealand architecture firms
Gummer, William Henry (1884–1966)
Ford, Charles Reginald (1880–1972)
New Zealand architecture
classical architecture
Auckland (N.Z.)
New Zealand
architecture education
architecture students
Unitec Institute of Technology
Unitec courses
design practice
architectural history
Citation
Mađanović, M., Moore, C. and Jadresin-Milic, R. (Re-)uses of historical knowledge in architectural education: The value of the client – Reginald Ford on professional practice, Asylum 2021, 160-165
Abstract
With the support of Tūāpapa Rangahau Research and Enterprise at Unitec New Zealand, a research project devoted to Gummer and Ford – an Auckland architectural firm founded in 1923 by William Henry Gummer (1884–1966) and Charles Reginald Ford (1880–1972) has been developed by a team of researchers. This paper announces the second stage of the research project devoted to Gummer and Ford, which builds up to the 2023 centenary of the firm’s establishment – seen as a milestone in the New Zealand architectural calendar. In 1921 Reginald Ford, a founding partner of Gummer and Ford, often described as New Zealand’s most eminent architectural firm from the interwar period, wrote an explanation of architectural practice titled “Architect and Client.” Ford’s explanation, written one hundred years ago, of what an architect is and what an architect does still rings remarkably true today. In framing his explanation from the client’s point of view, he naturally prioritises the ability of the architect to communicate, both with the client to manage expectations and to make clear the value of the architect, and to the contractor to assist in construction. This paper aims to show that, though commonly understood as detached from practice, history can teach us valuable lessons and provide solutions for contemporary professional challenges. With a little effort, architectural history could be reinvented by researchers and educators, reflecting all of the atest demands, pressures and priorities of higher education and the architecture profession throughout the world, enhanced by the accreditation process (NZRAB and AACA). In doing so, the teaching of history would produce knowledge that would stand the test of time and help equip students to practice architecture with confidence.
Publisher
Unitec ePress
DOI
Copyright holder
Authors
Copyright notice
All rights reserved
Copyright license
Available online at
This item appears in: