Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorMcGarrigle, Malachy
dc.contributor.authorKestle, Linda
dc.contributor.editorWajiha Mohsin Shahzad, Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-24T19:28:13Z
dc.date.available2020-03-24T19:28:13Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-20
dc.identifier.issn2463-4905
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/4902
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this project is to refine and rationalise the process where different tutors assess architectural drawings in order to mitigate personal subjectivity thereby generating more reliable assessment decisions. The study seeks to provide a structured approach to drawing assessment across teaching teams to reduce possible complaints regarding apparently inconsistent results between different classes. Objectives include promoting consistent drawing assessment between tutors on level 5 drawing papers within the Unitec Diploma in Architectural Technology. A clear structured method is envisaged whereby tutors evaluate content and draughtsmanship across individual drawings to produce more consistent assessment decisions across different cohorts on papers. Methodology in this project includes document analysis of early assessment material on the relevant papers. Reflection on the value of this material towards reaching consistent assessment decisions led to the development of more detailed marking rubrics for use across numerous drawing papers. After each course iteration reflection discussions and feedback were noted regarding the utility of the resource, drawing assessment criteria and specific criteria weightings. Recent feedback indicates that the latest rubrics are effective and close to final forms. Many tutors have indicated their satisfaction with rubric design, format and ease of use. Project findings will benefit tutors across construction drawing papers, helping them generate clear, reliable and consistent assessment decisions both individually and collectively. The approach can be utilised to assess drawings at various project stages and demonstrates clearly to tutors and students what is being assessed and also importantly, how it is being assessed.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectarchitecture educationen_NZ
dc.subjectUnitec coursesen_NZ
dc.subjectarchitectural drawingen_NZ
dc.subjectassessmenten_NZ
dc.titleReliable assessment of drawings on architectural technology coursesen_NZ
dc.typeConference Contribution - Paper in Published Proceedingsen_NZ
dc.date.updated2020-03-06T13:30:09Z
dc.subject.marsden130103 Higher Education
dc.subject.marsden120199 Architecture not elsewhere classified
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMcGarrigle, M., & Kestle, L. (2020). Reliable Assessment of Drawings on Architectural Technology Courses. In Wajiha Mohsin Shahzad, Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi (Ed.), Proceedings – New Zealand Built Environment Research Symposium , Vol. 6 (pp. 254-257). Retrieved from http://nzbers.massey.ac.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Proceedings-NZBERS-Feb2020.pdfen_NZ
unitec.publication.spage254en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage257en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume6en_NZ
unitec.conference.title6th New Zealand Built Environment Research Symposium (NZBERS 2020)en_NZ
unitec.conference.orgNew Zealand Built Environment Research Symposium (NZBERS)en_NZ
unitec.conference.locationPalmerston North, New Zealanden_NZ
unitec.conference.sdate2020-02-20
unitec.conference.edate2020-02-20
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms64868en_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms64869en_NZ
unitec.institution.studyareaEducation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record


© Unitec Institute of Technology, Private Bag 92025, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142