Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorBirchmore, Roger
dc.contributor.authorWallis, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, G.
dc.contributor.authorPivac, Andy
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Terri-Ann
dc.contributor.editorWajiha Mohsin Shahzad, Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-17T19:31:16Z
dc.date.available2020-03-17T19:31:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-20
dc.identifier.issn2463-4905
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/4901
dc.description.abstractIndustry standard calculations recognise airtightness as a positive characteristic when houses are designed to consume low levels of energy for heating or for cooling. In addition, airtightness will insulate the internal environment from externally generated contaminants such as particulates and volatile organic compounds (VOC’s). However, it will also contribute to the containment of internally generated contaminants to lower the quality of the internal environment. The overall impact of airtightness on the internal environment in New Zealand houses is not widely known and warrants further investigation. Air temperatures, relative humidity levels, dew points, particulate matter and VOC levels were monitored in the bedrooms of two, co-located houses, identical in layout and construction apart from details affecting their airtightness. Both spaces had controlled occupancy simulation that produced heat, moisture and contaminants from identical furnishings and decorations. The airtightness was found to have little impact on the internal thermal conditions and energy consumption. As expected, the vapour check, airtight house kept moisture levels above those seen in the conventional building but only slightly. PM10 levels in the conventional house exceeded guidelines for 41% of the time compared to 17% in the airtight house over the seven day period. The airtight test house reached VOC concentrations more than 300% above those in the conventional control house. This challenges conventional thinking on the contribution of airtightness to internal environmental conditions and warrants consideration in the review of building regulations.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectairtightnessen_NZ
dc.subjectweathertightnessen_NZ
dc.subjectindoor air qualityen_NZ
dc.subjectparticulate matteren_NZ
dc.subjectPM10 valuesen_NZ
dc.subjectvolatile organic compounds (VOC)en_NZ
dc.subjectVOCen_NZ
dc.titleAir tightness, friend or foe?en_NZ
dc.typeConference Contribution - Paper in Published Proceedingsen_NZ
dc.date.updated2020-03-06T13:30:08Z
dc.subject.marsden120202 Building Science and Techniquesen_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBirchmore, R.C., Wallis, S.L., Hernandez, G., Pivac, A., & Berry, T. (2020). Air Tightness, Friend or Foe?. In Wajiha Mohsin Shahzad, Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi (Ed.), Proceedings – New Zealand Built Environment Research Symposium , Vol. 6 (pp. 119-128). Retrieved from http://nzbers.massey.ac.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Proceedings-NZBERS-Feb2020.pdfen_NZ
unitec.publication.spage119en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage128en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume6en_NZ
unitec.publication.titleProceedings – New Zealand Built Environment Research Symposiumen_NZ
unitec.conference.title6th New Zealand Built Environment Research Symposium 2020en_NZ
unitec.conference.orgNew Zealand Built Environment Research Symposiumen_NZ
unitec.conference.locationAuckland, New Zealanden_NZ
unitec.conference.sdate2020-02-20
unitec.conference.edate2020-02-20
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms64867en_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms64870en_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms64871en_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms64872en_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms64873en_NZ
unitec.institution.studyareaConstruction + Engineering


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record


© Unitec Institute of Technology, Private Bag 92025, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142