dc.contributor.author | McPherson, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Pretty, Annabel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-02T02:36:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-02T02:36:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2206-9658 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10652/4218 | |
dc.description.abstract | Design is considered one of the most important parts of an architectural education.
Much emphasis is placed upon the Design Studio within a School of Architecture, yet in the traditional tutor/student model how much opportunity is there for the student to understand the process of designing when emulation forms the heart of the learning?
This paper reflects upon a series of large scale fabrication projects offered to students from 2012-2014 in Christchurch, New Zealand, under the umbrella of FESTA. These projects challenged the students to confront a series of ‘firsts’; to work collaboratively, to present themselves professionally, to navigate regulatory bodies, to engage with a client, and to realise a project at full, one to one, scale.
These projects tend to exist without a specific precedent for students to draw upon, as would be usual when designing one of any number a normal building typology. This forces students into a space of discovery, one where a design can change for any multitude of reasons. Students are moved from the usual Design Studio experience of problem solving to one where the situation is uncertain and problematic, to a space of problem setting. | en_NZ |
dc.language.iso | en | en_NZ |
dc.publisher | Queensland University of Technology (QUT) | en_NZ |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.journalpublicspace.org/article/view/125/89 | en_NZ |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Unitec courses | en_NZ |
dc.subject | architecture education | en_NZ |
dc.subject | design | en_NZ |
dc.subject | earthquakes | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Christchurch (N.Z.) | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Christchurch 2010-2011 earthquakes | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Festival of Transitional Architecture (FESTA) | en_NZ |
dc.subject | design processes | en_NZ |
dc.subject | iterative | en_NZ |
dc.subject | fabrication | en_NZ |
dc.subject | prototype | en_NZ |
dc.subject | technology | en_NZ |
dc.subject | New Zealand | en_NZ |
dc.title | Re-solved: iterating design solutions by understanding failure | en_NZ |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_NZ |
dc.date.updated | 2017-12-21T13:30:21Z | |
dc.rights.holder | © Queensland University of Technology | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.doi | DOI: 10.5204/jps.v2i3.125 | en_NZ |
dc.subject.marsden | 130299 Curriculum and Pedagogy not elsewhere classified | en_NZ |
dc.subject.marsden | 120199 Architecture not elsewhere classified | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | McPherson, P., & Pretty, A. (2017). Re-solved: iterating design solutions by understanding failure. The Journal of Public Space, 2(3) Critical Thresholds: Traversing Architectural Pedagogy, Research, and Practice, Special issue. pp.167-185. | en_NZ |
unitec.publication.spage | 167 | en_NZ |
unitec.publication.lpage | 200 | en_NZ |
unitec.publication.volume | 2 (Critical Thresholds : Traversing Architectural Pedagogy, Research, and Practice) | en_NZ |
unitec.publication.issue | 3 | en_NZ |
unitec.publication.title | The Journal of Public Space | en_NZ |
unitec.peerreviewed | yes | en_NZ |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Unitec Institute of Technology | en_NZ |
unitec.identifier.roms | 60108 | en_NZ |
unitec.identifier.roms | 60167 | |
unitec.publication.place | Brisbane, Queesland, Australia | en_NZ |
unitec.institution.studyarea | Architecture | |