Investigating a conceptual construct for software context
Loading...
Other Title
Authors
Kirk, D.C.
MacDonell, S.G.
MacDonell, S.G.
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2014-05-13
Supervisors
Type
Conference Contribution - Paper in Published Proceedings
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
software process models
software context
theory building
software context
theory building
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Kirk, D., and MacDonell, S.G. (2014, May). Investigating a conceptual construct for software context. ACM (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE2014) (pp.27).
Abstract
A growing number of empirical software engineering researchers suggest that a complementary focus on theory is required if the discipline is to mature. A first step in theory-building involves the establishment of suitable theoretical constructs. For researchers studying software projects, the lack of a theoretical construct for context is problematic for both experimentation and effort estimation. For experiments, insufficiently understood contextual factors confound results, and for estimation, unstated contextual factors affect estimation reliability. We have earlier proposed a framework that we suggest may be suitable as a construct for context i.e. represents a minimal, spanning set for the space of software contexts. The framework has six dimensions, described as Who, Where, What, When, How and Why. In this paper, we report the outcomes of a pilot study to test its suitability by categorising contextual factors from the software engineering literature into the framework. We found that one of the dimensions, Why, does not represent context, but rather is associated with objectives. We also identified some factors that do not clearly fit into the framework and require fur- ther investigation. Our contributions are the pursuing of
a theoretical approach to understanding software context, the initial establishment and evaluation of a construct for context and the exposure of a lack of clarity of meaning in many ‘contexts’ currently applied as factors for estimating project outcomes.
Publisher
ACM DL (Digital Library)
Permanent link
Link to ePress publication
DOI
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2601248.2601263
Copyright holder
Authors
Copyright notice
All rights reserved