Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorRoy, Dianne
dc.contributor.authorGasquoine, Susan
dc.contributor.authorCaldwell, Shirin
dc.contributor.authorNash, Derek
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-30T20:54:50Z
dc.date.available2016-06-30T20:54:50Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/3459
dc.description.abstractThe global burden of stroke is increasing. Many stroke survivors live with signi cant impairment; the care and support they and their families require is complex. Literature indicates some evidence to support the routine provision of information to stroke survivors and their families, but the best way to provide information is unclear. We undertook a mixed methods descriptive survey to ascertain information needs of stroke families through identifying current practice and resources, the appropriateness, accessibility, timeliness and information gaps. The survey, which is embedded in a longitudinal research programme titled ‘Stroke Families Whānau Programme’, was used to gain an understanding of family members’ (n=19) and prac oners’ (n=23) opinions on information provision post-stroke. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected via face-to-face interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data; content analysis was used for qualitative data. We found that for families, access to information was variable, both in quality and timeliness. Most described being overwhelmed initially with information they could not absorb; then later floundering as they had to nd their own way through the maze. Few could recall informa on that focused specifcally on them as family members. Health professionals described a range of resources and practices used to provide information. They identified barriers to e ec ve provision of information, including language and other communication barriers, time constraints and workload issues. Most did not assess health literacy levels or consider family needs to be separate to or different from the stroke survivor’s. We concluded that access to appropriate information post-stroke was problematic for most families ad was compounded by the nature of the experience; shock following the sudden onset and adjusting to changed family dynamics. Health professionals recognised the limitations of resources, time, and funding alongside the need for timely, quality education for families post-stroke, however, a gap was identified between health professionals’ theoretical understanding of best practice in information provision and their actual practice.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.subjectstroke (cerebrovascular accident)en_NZ
dc.subjectpatient educationen_NZ
dc.subjecthealth professionalsen_NZ
dc.subjectfamiliesen_NZ
dc.subjectcare giversen_NZ
dc.titleHealth professional and family perceptions of post-stroke informationen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.subject.marsden110201 Cardiology (incl. Cardiovascular Diseases)en_NZ
dc.subject.marsden111707 Family Careen_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRoy, D., Gasquoine, S., Caldwell, S., & Nash, D. (2015). Health professional and family perceptions of post-stroke information. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand, 31(2), pp.7-24en_NZ
unitec.institutionUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
unitec.publication.spage7en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage24en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume31(2)en_NZ
unitec.publication.titleNursing Praxis in New Zealanden_NZ
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms58125en_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms57685
unitec.identifier.roms58083
unitec.identifier.roms58159
unitec.institution.studyareaNursing


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record


© Unitec Institute of Technology, Private Bag 92025, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142