Can ecosystem-scale translocations mitigate the impact of climate change on terrestrial biodiversity? : promises, pitfalls, and possibilities
No Thumbnail Available
Other Title
Authors
Boyer, Stephane
Case, Bradley S.
Lefort, Marie-Caroline
Waterhouse, B.R.
Wratten, S.D.
Case, Bradley S.
Lefort, Marie-Caroline
Waterhouse, B.R.
Wratten, S.D.
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2016-03-07
Supervisors
Type
Journal Article
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
ecosystem-scale translocation (EST)
climate change
biodiversity
ecological conservation
climate change
biodiversity
ecological conservation
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Boyer, S., Case, B.S., Lefort, M.-C., Waterhouse, B.R., & Wratten, S.D. (2016). Can ecosystem-scale translocations mitigate the impact of climate change on terrestrial biodiversity?: Promises, pitfalls, and possibilities [version 1; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 5, p.146-157. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7914.1
Abstract
Because ecological interactions are the first components of the ecosystem to be impacted by climate change, future forms of threatened-species and ecosystem management should aim at conserving complete, functioning communities rather than single charismatic species. A possible way forward is the deployment of ecosystem-scale translocation (EST), where above- and below-ground elements of a functioning terrestrial ecosystem (including vegetation and topsoil) are carefully collected and moved together. Small-scale attempts at such practice have been made for the purpose of ecological restoration. By moving larger subsets of functioning ecosystems from climatically unstable regions to more stable ones, EST could provide a practical means to conserve mature and complex ecosystems threatened by climate change. However, there are a number of challenges associated with EST in the context of climate change mitigation, in particular the choice of donor and receptor sites. With the aim of fostering discussion and debate about the EST concept, we 1) outline the possible promises and pitfalls of EST in mitigating the impact of climate change on terrestrial biodiversity and 2) use a GIS-based approach to illustrate how potential source and receptor sites, where EST could be trialed and evaluated globally, could be identified.
Publisher
F1000 Research Ltd
Permanent link
Link to ePress publication
DOI
10.12688/f1000research.7914.1
Copyright holder
Authors
Copyright notice
Copyright: © 2016 Boyer S. et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand