Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorFlanagan, Paul
dc.contributor.authorTumilty, Emma
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-12T21:00:16Z
dc.date.available2016-01-12T21:00:16Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-27
dc.identifier.issn2423-009X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/3164
dc.description.abstractUntil recently, community organisations in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) have not had any avenue for ethical review of research involving human participants unless they were connected to researchers involved with health and disability research (narrowly-­‐defined), or tertiary education institutions. The New Zealand Ethics Committee (NZEC), a recent community research development initiative, has invited organisations to submit their proposals for voluntary ethics review and provides research methodology support where sought. This paper introduces this initiative, describing both its make-­‐up and processes. It also explores the relationship between reviewer-­‐applicant in the NZEC as distinctive to the relationship of reviewer-­‐applicant in traditional ethical review settings, explaining this difference of power relations and philosophy. Those in the community see research ethics review as something to be learned along with research methodology/practice.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherUnitec ePressen_NZ
dc.rightsWhanake: The Pacific Journal of Community Development is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-­‐NonCommercial 4.0 International License.en_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/nz/*
dc.subjectNew Zealand Ethics Committee (NZEC)en_NZ
dc.subjectresearch ethicsen_NZ
dc.subjectresearch with human participantsen_NZ
dc.subjectcommunity development researchen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealand. Committee of Inquiry into Allegations concerning the Treatment of Cervical Cancer at National Women's Hospital and into other related matters.en_NZ
dc.subjectCartwright Inquiryen_NZ
dc.titleHow does voluntary ethics improve research? : introducing a community research development initiativeen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.rights.holderUnitec ePressen_NZ
dc.subject.marsden220107 Professional Ethics (incl. police and research ethics)en_NZ
dc.subject.marsden111708 Health and Community Servicesen_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFlanagan, P. and Tumilty, E. (2015) How does voluntary ethics improve research? Introducing a community research development initiative, Whanake: The Pacific Journal of Community Development, 1(2), 14-­23. Unitec Institute of Technology. Unitec ePress. Retrieved from: http://www.unitec.ac.nz/epressen_NZ
unitec.institutionUniversity of Waikatoen_NZ
unitec.institutionOtago Polytechnicen_NZ
unitec.publication.spage14en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage23en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume1(2)en_NZ
unitec.publication.titleWhanake: The Pacific Journal of Community Developmenten_NZ
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationOtago Polytechnicen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Waikatoen_NZ
unitec.relation.epresshttp://www.unitec.ac.nz/epress/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/How-does-Voluntary-Ethics-Improve-Research-by-Paul-Flanagan-and-Emma-Tumilty.pdfen_NZ
unitec.institution.studyareaCommunity Development


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand

© Unitec Institute of Technology, Private Bag 92025, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142