The scholarship of teaching and learning in an age of accountability : building bridges
No Thumbnail Available
Other Title
Authors
Hutchings, Pat
Borin, Paola
Keesing-Styles, Linda
Martin, Lynn
Michael, Renee
Scharff, Lauren
Simkins, Scott
Ismail, Ahmed
Borin, Paola
Keesing-Styles, Linda
Martin, Lynn
Michael, Renee
Scharff, Lauren
Simkins, Scott
Ismail, Ahmed
Author ORCID Profiles (clickable)
Degree
Grantor
Date
2013
Supervisors
Type
Journal Article
Ngā Upoko Tukutuku (Māori subject headings)
Keyword
higher education
scholarship of teaching and learning
accountability
quality improvement
scholarship of teaching and learning
accountability
quality improvement
ANZSRC Field of Research Code (2020)
Citation
Hutchings, P., Borin, P., Keesing-Styles, L., Martin, L., Michael, R., Scharff, L., Smikins, S., and Ismail, A. (2013). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Age of Accountability: Building Bridges. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal. 1 (2) : 35-47.
Abstract
In recent years, as pressures for accountability have increased in higher education, some members of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) community may worry that the inquiry-based, improvement-focused practices they advocate could be put at risk by easy-to-administer, one-size-fits-all forms of assessment, quality assurance, and administrative control. But while acknowledging both real and perceived tensions between these two movements, we also examine some of the ways and settings in which they are converging, featuring a number of international examples in which external quality and assessment mandates have been employed to support SoTL-like work. We look, too, at the roles that scholars of teaching and learning can play as mediators and brokers between the two movements, helping to translate accountability requirements into opportunities for improvement. In short we argue that these two movements present opportunities for each other. SoTL can contribute to what is, or should be, the central goal of accountability: ensuring and improving the quality of student learning. The accountability movement, for its part, can provide a new context for integrating and valuing SoTL as a force for positive change on campuses and beyond. Taken together, the two approaches can make meaningful contributions to higher learning today. The paper concludes with recommendations to the SoTL community for building bridges between the two movements.
Publisher
Indiana University Press
Permanent link
Link to ePress publication
DOI
10.1353/iss.2013.0026
Copyright holder
Indiana University Press
Copyright notice
An online version is available behind a wall but free with institutional access from Project Muse at http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/teaching_and_learning_inquiry__the_issotl_journal/v001/1.2.hutchings.html