dc.contributor.author | Henwood, Suzanne | |
dc.contributor.author | Edie, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Flinton, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Simpson, R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-09T02:42:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-09T02:42:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10652/2334 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article reviews research published over the last 15 years, exploring the various components of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and considers why it is important and whose responsibility it is. The style that CPD should take to maximize participation and effectiveness and the expected benefits and practical problems associated with CPD are issues that are raised. A modified definition of CPD is put forward which not only allows for flexibility of input but also considers the impact on clinical practice. | en_NZ |
dc.language.iso | en | en_NZ |
dc.rights | All rights reserved | en_NZ |
dc.subject | continuing professional development (CPD) | en_NZ |
dc.subject | reviews | en_NZ |
dc.title | Continuing professional development - a re-examination of the facts | en_NZ |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_NZ |
dc.rights.holder | The College of Radiographers | en_NZ |
dc.subject.marsden | 119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Henwood, S., Edie, J., Flinton, D., & Simpson, R. (1998). Continuing professional development—a re-examination of the facts. Radiography, 4(1), 5-8. | en_NZ |
unitec.institution | Unitec Institute of Technology | en_NZ |
unitec.publication.title | Radiography | en_NZ |
unitec.peerreviewed | yes | en_NZ |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Unitec Institute of Technology | en_NZ |
dc.contributor.affiliation | City University (London, England) | en_NZ |
unitec.institution.studyarea | Medical Imaging | |