Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorHenwood, Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorEdie, J
dc.contributor.authorFlinton, D.
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, R.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T02:42:17Z
dc.date.available2013-10-09T02:42:17Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/2334
dc.description.abstractThis article reviews research published over the last 15 years, exploring the various components of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and considers why it is important and whose responsibility it is. The style that CPD should take to maximize participation and effectiveness and the expected benefits and practical problems associated with CPD are issues that are raised. A modified definition of CPD is put forward which not only allows for flexibility of input but also considers the impact on clinical practice.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.rightsAll rights reserveden_NZ
dc.subjectcontinuing professional development (CPD)en_NZ
dc.subjectreviewsen_NZ
dc.titleContinuing professional development - a re-examination of the factsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.rights.holderThe College of Radiographersen_NZ
dc.subject.marsden119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classifieden_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHenwood, S., Edie, J., Flinton, D., & Simpson, R. (1998). Continuing professional development—a re-examination of the facts. Radiography, 4(1), 5-8.en_NZ
unitec.institutionUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
unitec.publication.titleRadiographyen_NZ
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationCity University (London, England)en_NZ
unitec.institution.studyareaMedical Imaging


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record